Join us on Twitter
Trump vs Radical Judicial Activists
February 19th, 2017

Preamble: The recent egregious decisions by activist Federal judges halting Trump's legal Executive Order issued pursuant to 8 USC 1182(f) that temporarily bans individuals from seven countries well known to be closely tied to terrorists from entering America were an outrageous abomination of justice. These judges willfully violated the U. S. Constitution, disgraced America, and impugned the judiciary. It is abundantly clear that their biased opinions were based on personal ideology far removed America's best interests and her laws.

The purpose of this blog is to opine on the judicial farce and discuss the following relevant matters:

  • Specific powers vested in the Federal judiciary by the Constitution and how that branch has run amok in recent years to the detriment of the populous
  • Cite the Constitutional authority upon which Trump relied in issuing the Executive Order
  • The ideology underlying the decisions
Prior to beginning this blog, I must point out the Federal District Court judge who halted Trump's legal ban is the dishonorable James Robart out of Washington State. His decisions consistently evince an ugly pattern of being anti-law enforcement while actively advocating for illegal aliens, Muslims, and BLM thugs.

U. S. Constitutional Basics: The U.S. Constitution divides the federal government into three distinct branches to ensure centralization while preventing an individual or group from having too much control, commonly referred to as the separation of powers. Those branches and their respective compositions are as follows:
  • Legislative - Congress (Senate and House of Representatives)
  • Executive - President, Vice President, and Cabinet
  • Judicial - Supreme Court and various lower federal courts
U. S. Constitution Articles 1 and III: These articles are relevant to the aforementioned judicial decisions and for the sake of brevity are described below:
  • Article 1 Section 1 vests the legislative power to enact laws exclusively in Congress
  • Article III Section 1 vests judicial power to interpret, apply and determine the constitutionality of laws in one Supreme court and various lower courts periodically established by Congress
Trump's Constitutional Authority: In issuing the subject ban Trump's Executive Order tracked and cited the verbiage of 8 USC 1182 (f) verbatim. This statute, set forth below, vests the president with the absolute authority to suspend the entry of aliens or any class of aliens for national-security purposes for any period of time that he deems necessary.

  Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

It is crystal clear that Trump's Executive Order was legal pursuant to the applicable statute and should have never been halted. It is also clear that each decision was made by radical activist liberal judges that knowingly ventured from their domain of interpreting and applying the law into verboten territory of legislating for their own self interests.

The net effect of their intentional reckless self-serving decisions was to wrest the exclusive power vested in the President under 8 USC 1182 (f) and vest it in themselves. As a matter of record, the Supreme Court has ruled that the power assigned to each branch must remain with that branch, and may be expressed only by that branch. Ginsburg, Douglas H. "Essays on Article I: Legislative Vesting Clause" Ergo, in each instance the courts willfully violated the Constitution by assuming the legislative role which is exclusively vested in Congress.

Left Wing Judicial Activists: The radical judges meting out their biased version of justice halting Trump's Executive Order in blatant violation of the Constitution are neither rogue nor have the 'God-like' status as they perceive themselves because of their black robes. In fact, they are among the repulsive group of arrogant, radical left wing activist jurists that flourished and became mainstream under Obama who routinely trashed the U.S. Constitution as a matter of course. The judiciary's role and rule of law as specifically set forth in the Constitution are of total indifference to them. Rather, the Constitution is trumped by self-serving decisions cleverly underpinned by Marxist political correctness consistently subordinating America's best interests to minorities. Such judges masquerade behind black robes feigning judicial neutrality while using their powerful positions to propagate personal agendas, the law notwithstanding.

Marxism: I know a tie-in to Marxism and political correctness sounds absurd but please bear with me and it will make perfect sense. For the sake of brevity, Cultural Marxism was conceived in Frankfurt Germany, circa 1921. It soon supplanted Karl Marx's failed Economic Marxism and became modern day Marxism. Its goal has always been to annihilate traditional Western culture and values through a peaceful, indefensible cultural revolution then supplant them with Marxist ideology. Focus turned to America in the early 1930s.

Political Correctness: While the use and meaning of 'politically correct' run the gamut today, it is not about tolerance and diversity as proponents espouse. Early Marxists developed political correctness as a critical component in achieving their cultural revolution. Political correctness is a deceptive term for progressivism and multiculturalism; both are euphemisms for Marxism cleverly used to conceal the true ideology. Ergo, political correctness is Marxism.

It operates as a devious psychological command and control concept to manipulate and force mass compliance with uniformity in the desired thought, speech, and behavior relative to a group or its cause. Tools of choice to force acquiescence or silence are typically vicious ad hominem attacks, public demonization, and violence. The intended implementation of political correctness is being perfectly exemplified by acts of anti-Trump groups that include the following:
  • MSM's incessant barrage of lies and vilification of Trump and his family
  • Organized and funded Saul Alinsky style riots and violence
  • Congressional Democrats
  • Immigration activists
The radical judges halting Trump's temporary ban are included in the foregoing groups by virtue of their intentional unconstitutional rulings. However, the consequences of their decisions are far more dangerous than the others because they can directly affect the national security of our country, if only temporarily, as they have willfully done in this instance.

The Judiciary-Marxist Nexus: Judges, like people working in other endeavors, acquire their education through academia. For years Marxist political correctness has dominated the academic curricula and spoon fed to students under the innocuous euphemism of progressivism. Disciplines traditionally taught have been subordinated to and in many instances replaced by mandatory classes in 'White Guilt' and various forms of minority supremacy. Therefore, it logically follows that one being indoctrinated with Marxist ideology through the academic years can absorb, believe, and adopt it through life regardless of their specific field of endeavor. Judges are no exception and this is clearly manifested in decisions of 'progressives' based on personal ideology instead of law who bought into and propagate Marxism as evinced in the Trump decisions.

Detailed information on Today's Academic Curricula is available in my following blogs:

Academic Shock -
Revising Truths in Academia -

Trump's Perseverance: No president in U.S. history has been subjected to and endured the incessant vicious ad hominem attacks, congressional and judicial interference, and other deterrents maliciously intended to prevent him from performing his job. Not surprisingly, despite massive resistance, to his credit he is moving forward at warp speed and Making America Great Again. Decent Americans that love our country are extremely fortunate to have a man of Trump's character, intelligence, and dedication to her as President.

As an aside, one of the most egregious examples of judicial activism was when Obama's punk Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts legislated and helped his pal by re-writing Obama Care twice to make it legal. We know the results of that expensive fraud thanks to Roberts. The late honorable astute Justice Scalia ripped Obama's boy Roberts in a scathing dissent you can read Here.

View archived blogs here

Valerie Knight
March 17th, 2017 11:24 am
You are correct in my opinion on all points. Judicial overreach: can it be ignored by President Trump? Does that depend on Homeland Security's support of POTUS? It is my knee jerk reaction, but logistically can it be done?
Ralph Risch
March 1st, 2017 7:30 pm
Very enlightening! I am looking forward to more.
Carlos Ortiz
February 26th, 2017 12:36 pm
AMERICA has to return to the way of conservative values and leadership. Our way of life is in danger.
Kenneth M. Davis
February 23rd, 2017 5:47 pm
Trump was completely right in his actions.When this judgment is all over congress needs to bring these judges in for an impeachment proceedings. They have over reached their office and failed to honer their oath.
Leave a Comment
* Name
* Email (will not be published)
* Enter verification code
* - Reqiured fields
Back to Blog
Join our free email list
for updates
Contact us at this email link

CM Accounting & Tax Services
Let Experts Maximize Your Refund & Minimize Your Taxes.
Professional Services
For 17 Years

Check us out at:

Stop Being Confused Over Weight Loss Hype
Lose weight fast and easy:
eat the foods you love,
and be healthier.

Sound Too Good To Be True –
Find Out Here